Legal Opinion
Glicksman v. Laitman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 4, 1968No. 64 Civ. 1056PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVET, District Judge.
The above-entitled action is a claim by Carol Glicksman and by Paul Glicksman, her husband, which grows out of a collision of two motor vehicles. Plaintiff Carol Glicksman was operating one of these motor vehicles and the defendant, Sidney Laitman, was operating the other. The first claim in the complaint is because of injuries, etc. to the plaintiff Carol Glicksman. The second claim is that of the husband for expenses of medical services, “domestic and other necessary aid and attention” and loss of *426services, etc. of the wife. The husband’s claim seeks damages in the sum…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Walter Jaconski v. Avisun Corporation and W. v. Pangborne & Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Anne Arnold and Edward E. Arnold v. Tex Troccoli, Also Known as "Tex Barton,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Mariana Deutsch and Abraham Deutsch v. Hewes Street Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Del Sesto v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1962
- Emland Builders, Inc., a Corporation, M. B. Landau and Ed Landau v. Barney T. SheaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Curtis v. Peerless Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
- Arnav Industries, Inc. v. DreskinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Elfand ex rel. Elfand v. WidmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968