Legal Opinion

State v. Essex

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 4, 2013No. A12-2268PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLEARY, Judge.

Following a jury trial, appellant was convicted of attempted second-degree assault, carrying a pistol in a public place while under the influence of alcohol, and disorderly conduct. Appellant challenges his attempted-assault and carrying-a-pistol convictions, arguing that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support *808those convictions. Appellant also challenges his sentence for attempted assault, arguing that the sentence was based on an aggravating factor found by the district court, in violation of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. State v. AndersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. FrinellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State of Minnesota v. Dylan Thomas PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API