Commonwealth v. Berrigan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This appeal follows appellants’ convictions by a jury on charges of burglary,1 criminal mischief2 and criminal con*249spiracy.3 The incident leading to appellants’ arrests occurred on September 9, 1981 when they entered a General Electric plant in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania and beat missile components with hammers. They also poured human blood on the premises. They were arrested at the factory some time later. No personal injuries occurred. Property damage apparently exceeded $28,000.4
At trial appellants did not deny having committed these actions, but sought to defend themselves…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. AverWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. BerriganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. BerriganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- United States v. Charles J. Quilty, Frank Fessler, and Larry A. MorlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Andrews v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.