Hermansky v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KENYON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff in error was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska on the first and third counts of an information charging violation of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § lOlSS1^ et seq.). The first charged an illegal sale of intoxicating liquor; the third, maintaining a nuisance by keeping a place where intoxicating liquor fit for beverage purposes was kept for sale and sold. Plaintiff in error (hereafter designated defendant) was a druggist. He had a government permit to use alcohol for nonbeverage purposes in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Chesapeake & Delaware Canal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Singer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- Rich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Haussener v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Goldstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Kinard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Kreiner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Salerno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Stassi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.