Legal Opinion

Edison v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided November 29, 1985No. A-940PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COATS, Judge.

James Edison pled nolo contendere to driving while intoxicated. AS 28.35.-030(a)(1). On appeal, he challenges only the condition of probation requiring him to obtain, for a period of one year, written court permission before entering the village of Marshall. We vacate that condition of probation.

At the sentencing hearing, the magistrate commented that in the past four months he had twice sentenced Edison for alcohol-related misdemeanor assaults, and that by driving while intoxicated Edison had violated the conditions of those proba-tions. The court fined Edison $500 with $250…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Sprague v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Martin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Tiedeman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Oyoghok v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. BrockelmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. Allain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  3. State v. SchimelpfenigCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. State v. SchimelpfenigCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API