Legal Opinion

Ross v. Arnold

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided December 22, 1983No. Civ. A. No. 83-C-633Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff, Donald Ross, has brought an action for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Robert Arnold, the Walworth County Family Court Commissioner. Ross asserts that Judge Arnold denied him his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of law. Arnold has moved to dismiss on the grounds of absolute judicial immunity. A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim tests only the sufficiency of a complaint. Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1686, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974). Further, a motion for failure to state a claim should not be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API