Legal Opinion
O'HARA v. Kovens
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 12, 1979No. Civ. Y-78-2329PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH H. YOUNG,. District Judge.
The plaintiffs, James, Michael, and Josephine M. O’Hara, seek compensatory and punitive damages against the defendants as the result of the sale of their stock in the Marlboro Race Track to the defendants on December 31, 1971. The complaint alleges three counts of fraud based upon state and federal law. Count I states a federal cause of action alleging that defendants’ conduct violated Rule lOb-5, 1 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (1978), promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j (1976). Count…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- O'HARA v. KovensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Homero Lopez v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Morley v. CohenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
- Hector v. WegleinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1982
- Bassett v. Sterling Drug, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.