Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 2002No. 41 MAP 2001Published

1Concurrence

MADAME, Justice Newman,

concurring.

While I agree with the Majority that a determination of capricious disregard was unwarranted in this case, I write separately to further make it clear that I believe there is no capricious disregard standard of review of agency decisions. The appropriate standard of review in appeals from agency decisions, which has been previously articulated by this Court, is set forth in Section 5 of the Administrative Agency Law, 2 Pa.C.S. § 704. See, e.g., Fraternal Order of Police v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 557 Pa. 586, 735 A.2d 96 (1999) (hereinafter FOP)-,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Kirkwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Farquhar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API