Legal Opinion

Ashcraft v. Wallingford

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 23, 1977No. 1242-3PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against the defendants for damages arising from an automobile collision, which occurred when both parties attempted to pass a third vehicle. From a summary judgment granted in favor of defendants, 1 plaintiff appeals.

The propriety of the summary judgment presents the sole issue on appeal. Plaintiff contends (1) issues of material fact exist as to his contributory negligence, and as to defendant's last clear chance to avoid the collision; and (2) comparative negligence applies. We affirm.

In considering a motion for summary judgment, the court's function is to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. LaPlante v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Godfrey v. WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. BurriWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Amant v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Green v. Normandy ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Green v. Normandy Park Riviera Section Community Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Parker v. United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. Tennant v. RoysCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  5. Gross v. SundingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API