Legal Opinion
Harker v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided December 10, 1981No. 5232PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Ralph Harker was convicted on his plea of no contest to a charge of armed robbery. 1 He appeals the superior court’s denial of two motions: (1) alleging a violation of his speedy trial right under Criminal Rule 45, and (2) alleging a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act as the basis for suppressing material evidence seized from him. 2 He also appeals his sentence as excessive. We will discuss the facts as they are necessary to our determination of these three issues.
The Rule 45 Motion: Alaska Rule of Criminal Procedure 45(b), (c), and (d) require that a defendant charged with a crime…
3Cases cited29 opinions
- Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Oveson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Gillars v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- United States v. Michael A. WolffsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Ruby Davidson Walden and William Luther WaldenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- Harker v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Berumen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008
- Nathan v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998
- Municipality of Anchorage v. KingCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.