Legal Opinion

Moore v. Sinnott

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 3, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Brinson. Richmond superior court. June 13, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.

By the will of Andrew M. Moore certain property, including that now in dispute, was left to Sinnott and others as his executors and trustees, in trust for his three sons, Albert H., George M., and Henry G. Each son was to receive the income from one third of this property, not subject to his debts or to be disposed of by him. Upon the death of any one of the sons, his share was to go to the other two, and, upon the death of one of the latter, the entire income was to go to the survivor. Upon the death of all of the sons, the will made provision that the executors and trustees should’hold it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sinnott v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. DeVaughn v. HaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Wadley v. LeCatoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Stephens v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  5. Bridgeport-City Trust Co. v. BeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API