Richardson v. McCutchen
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
Appellant, a former director of the Williamsburg County Recreation Department, initiated this action to recover $25,333.00 pursuant to his employment contract which had been terminated by the Williamsburg County Recreation Commission. Appellant alleged that the two acts increasing the number of recreation commissioners from five to seven and then from seven to nine were unconstitutional, and therefore, his termination by the nine member commission was invalid. Respondents, members of various governing bodies of Williamsburg County, were granted a summary judgment. We conclude…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Duncan v. County of YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Kleckley v. PulliamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Horry County v. CookeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Torgerson v. CraverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Van Fore v. CookeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Spartanburg Sanitary Sewer District v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Hamm v. CromerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Hamm v. CromerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Spar. San. Sew. Dist. v. City of Spar.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1984