Legal Opinion
Ronald Dale Smith v. Raymond Roberts Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 18, 1997No. 95-3237PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.
Ronald Dale Smith was convicted after a state court jury trial on two counts of aggravated indecent liberties with a child. He filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging that his due process rights were violated both because admittedly false testimony was given at trial and because the State did not reveal the falsity as soon as it was discovered. The district court denied relief. Mr. Smith appeals and we affirm. 1
I
The evidence against Mr. Smith consisted primarily of the testimony of the victim and her mother, Mr. Smith’s then-wife,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Walter Sanders v. James E. Sullivan and Robert Abrams, the Attorney General of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- O.C. Chick Fero v. Dareld KerbyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Douglas v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Moore v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Tennison v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Steidl v. FermonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. CrockettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.