Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Keehn

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. Wo. 8528PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Erom the Kosciusko Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

This was a written motion by the appellee to correct the record of a judgment, by supplying an alleged omission therein, so as to make it show that the original note therein sued on was filed with the complaint; annexed to the motion was an affidavit in support thereof by the attorney of the appellee.

The appellants appeared without process and moved to dismiss the motion because it was filed more than two years after the rendition of the judgment, as was shown by the motion itself. The motion to dismiss was overruled.

*200The appellants then filed a demurrer to the motion for two…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Buck v. HavensIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Lake v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Nord v. MartyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Smith v. NoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Phelps v. OsgoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harris v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Dobbins v. McNamaraIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. EggersIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Macy v. LindleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Wellinger v. WellingerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API