Legal Opinion
Shinn v. Budd
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided February 15, 1862PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
On the nineteenth of July, 1852, Charles Cotton, being seized in fee of a house and lot in Southampton, mortgaged the same to secure the payment of $225 to Isaac Hilliard. The mortgage was subsequently assigned to Andrew Fort.
On the first of March, 1856, Cotton died, and letters of administration upon his estate were granted to Shinn, the complainant. The personal estate proving insufficient to pay the debts, the administrator obtained an order of the Orphans Court to sell the real estate of the decedent for the payment of debts. In pursuance of this order, the mortgaged…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sanford v. McLeanNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Johnson's Ex. v. DuncanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1822
- Millaudon v. New-Orleans Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1822
3Cited by7 opinions
- Camden Co. Welfare Bd. v. Federal Dep. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
- Progressive Insurance v. Universal Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Schmid v. First Camden National Bank, C., Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- Meier v. PlanerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Elmora and West End, C., Assn. v. DancyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.