Richman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Wilkinson,
The facts of this case are essentially undisputed. The appellant is the law partnership of Greenlee, Richman, Derrico & Posa. This firm had been retained by Lloyd E. Myers, claimant, to represent him in a workmen’s compensation claim against appellee United States Steel Corporation.
*596Claimant had been injured on April 2, 1971. Appellee corporation denied that a compensable accident had taken place, but in lieu of workmen’s compensation, had paid claimant sickness and accident benefits during the period of his disability. Also during this period, the claimant received…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Furia v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glinka v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. LeuschenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. General Machine Products Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Landis v. Zimmerman Motors, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Lerner v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.