Legal Opinion

Richman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1975No. Appeal, No. 182 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

The facts of this case are essentially undisputed. The appellant is the law partnership of Greenlee, Richman, Derrico & Posa. This firm had been retained by Lloyd E. Myers, claimant, to represent him in a workmen’s compensation claim against appellee United States Steel Corporation.

*596Claimant had been injured on April 2, 1971. Appellee corporation denied that a compensable accident had taken place, but in lieu of workmen’s compensation, had paid claimant sickness and accident benefits during the period of his disability. Also during this period, the claimant received…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Furia v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Glinka v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. LeuschenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. General Machine Products Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Landis v. Zimmerman Motors, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Lerner v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API