Legal Opinion
Spiller v. Continental Tube Co.
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1983No. 56892PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Underwood
The plaintiffs in this case, Emmy Lou and Clifford E. Spiller, were the owners of two corporations, Spiller and Spiller, Inc., and L. P. Industrial Building Corporation. Emmy Lou Spiller, individually, and the L. P. corporation loaned money to Spiller and Spiller, Inc., in return for the promissory notes of the corporation. The L. P. corporation was subsequently dissolved, and its assets transferred to Clifford Spiller.
On September 1, 1974, defendant, the Continental Tube Company (Continental), entered into an “Agreement for Purchase of Assets" with Spiller and Spiller, Inc., et al., whereby…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Towns v. Yellow Cab Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- People Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. v. BuaIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Ostendorf v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- John T. Henry and Evelyn I. Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, an Illinois Banking Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Orenic v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Catlett v. NovakIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Joseph Hagee, Reed Mitchell Hagee and Raymond Jump v. City of Evanston, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Fearon v. Mobil Joliet Refining Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.