Thorman v. American Seafoods Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
Philip Thorman, on behalf of a class of similarly situated crew members, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of American Seafoods Company and American Seafoods Company LLC (in personam defendants) as well as various vessels owned by these companies (in rem defendants) (the defendants collectively, “American Seafoods”). The district court concluded that Thorman’s claims were time-barred because the contractual six-month limit on disputes had expired. We agree and affirm the district court’s summary judgment order.
Crucial to our decision is…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- August v. US BancorpCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Smith v. Seaport Marine, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2013
- Huseman v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Huseman v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Huseman v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.