Legal Opinion

Schoen's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1922No. Appeals, Nos. 249, 250 and 251PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The sole question in this appeal is whether there was a conversion of realty into personalty, whereby the widow took an absolute estate in all the property. By the will of Charles T. Schoen, his wife was to receive “such portion of my estate and in such manner as she would be entitled to receive under the intestate laws had I died intestate.” The court below found there was not sufficient personalty to meet subsequent bequests, hence there was an implied conversion, arising from an absolute necessity to sell to execute the will; and, further, there was a fund…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Chamberlain's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Painter v. PainterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Reel's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Dull's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shugars v. Chamberlain Amusements Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Shaffer v. ShafferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Shareff's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Bailey's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Kikel v. KikelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API