Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Porter

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The defendant Porter on January 3, 1916, having recovered final judgment for damages assessed by the' court in an action of tort against the plaintiff in review, who never appeared but was defaulted, he petitioned thereafter for a writ of review, which was granted, and the execution was stayed or superseded.

A review under our law is said to be equivalent to a new trial after judgment, and everything is open upon the review as it would have been in the original action. But the judgment is not set aside. It stands until the judgment in review, which may affirm, reverse, or modify the former…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lynn Gas & Electric Co. v. Creditors National Clearing HouseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Fuller v. StorerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Safford v. KnightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  4. Farris v. St. Paul's Baptist ChurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Flynn v. Curtis & Pope Lumber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API