In re Stanley R.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bracken, J. P.
This proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10 was dismissed by the Family Court, Suffolk County, on the ground that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the child who is the subject of the proceeding was not alleged to be present in the State of New York. On this appeal by the petitioner, we reverse the order and reinstate the petition.
i
This proceeding was brought in the Family Court, Suffolk County, pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, based upon the petition of an officer of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services dated…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hunt v. . HuntNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- In re Tammie Z.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Thrasher v. United States Liability InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Greschler v. GreschlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Kali-Ann E.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re Westchester County Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Pierson v. PiersonNew York City Family Court · 1990
- In re Victor G.New York City Family Court · 1994
- Matter of Lopez v. ReyesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.