Legal Opinion
Alliance Securities Co. v. De Vilbiss Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 29, 1928No. 735PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKillits, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). In our opinion a determination of the issue of infringement raised by the pleadings requires but a few simple deductions from the record, principally from the terms of the Hopkins patent and the history of its prosecution shown in the file wrapper contents.
So far as this case is concerned, we are not now privileged to go into the general question of validity of the Hopkins patent; for we find from the record that the defendant here, the De Vilbiss Manufacturing Company, became so connected with the defense in actions brought by the present plaintiff in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- A. R. Mosler & Co. v. LurieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- Asbestos Shingle, Slate & Sheathing Co. v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911
- Simpson v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- Gerosa v. Apco Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
- Crown Cork & Seal Co. of Baltimore City v. Sterling Cork & Seal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Black & Yates, Inc. v. Mahogany Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Dehydro, Inc. v. Tretolite Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1931
- Howe v. AtwoodDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1942
- COMMERCIAL TRAVELERS MUTUAL ACC. ASS'N v. KilgoreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- (PC) Smithee v. California Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.