Legal Opinion

Lanier v. Lanier

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 20, 1949No. 32454PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The plaintiff had a right to sign her own petition. Art. I, sec. I, par. IV, of the Constitution of this State (Code, Ann., § 2-104) provides as follows: “No person shall be deprived of the right to prosecute or defend his own cause in any of the courts of this State, in person, by attorney, or both.” See Loomis v. State, 78 Ga. App. 153 (51 S. E. 2d, 13); Tatum v. Allison, Anderson & Co., 31 Ga. 337.

Counsel for the defendant contends that, since the passage of the act of 1931 (Code § 9-401) as amended in 1937, defining the practice of law, and the act…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Loomis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  2. Currie v. DeaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Carter v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Austin v. Ferst's Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Tatum v. Allison, Anderson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1860

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cobble v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Lee v. Precision Balancing & MacHine, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API