Legal Opinion

Lee v. Precision Balancing & MacHine, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 9, 1975No. 50427PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

Appeal was taken in this case from an order overruling the plaintiffs motion for default judgment, a certificate of review having been obtained. The plaintiff filed a petition seeking recovery for a defective engine. The complaint was served on November 3, 1969. On November 14, 1969 an answer was filed containing the following pertinent portions. The answer was entitled "Charles F. Lee, plaintiff v. Precision Balancing & Machine, Inc., defendant,” and stated: "Comes now the defendant in the above styled case and files his answer and states as follows.” Then follows a statement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cook v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Gillis v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Currie v. DeaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Lanier v. LanierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. PBJ DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. HolbenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API