Legal Opinion

United States v. Croxford

District Court, D. Utah

Decided July 7, 2004No. 2:02-cr-00302PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER FINDING APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES UNCONSTITUTIONAL

CASSELL, Ilistrict Judge.

Defendant Brent Croxford is before the court for sentencing on the offense of sexual exploitation of a child in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). For more than fifteen years, sentencings such as Croxford’s have been governed by the federal sentencing guidelines. Last Thursday, however, the United States Supreme Court ruled that portions of the State of Washington’s sentencing guidelines were unconstitutional. The Court held that Washingtdn’s guidelines scheme…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Freddie J. BookerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Francisco D. Pineiro, Also Known as Frank PineiroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Hector Penaranda, Also Known as "El Viejo," United States of America v. Luis Rojas, Also Known as El GordoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2005
  5. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API