Legal Opinion · Dissent

Oklahoma Ass'n for Equitable Taxation v. City of Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1995No. 85287Published

1DissentSimms, Justice

I must respectfully dissent. The fundamental structure of the MAPS refund provision is flawed because it is not based on a tax exemption or tax credit. I have not found any authority which supports a tax refund standing alone, and the majority cites none. Every statutory scheme for a refund of this nature is founded on an explicit exemption from payment of the tax.

As the majority points out, the legislature has created certain classes of taxpayers who are entitled by statute to receive a refund of sales tax paid based on statutory exemptions, but the majority does not perceive the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Independent School District No. 9 v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. McDonald's Corp. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Wenner v. MotherseadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Autumn House v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API