Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Kornhoff

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 14, 1915PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Kenton Circuit Court (Criminal, Common Law and Equity Division).-

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming.

The appelle, George B. Kornhoff, was an employe of the appellant railroad company as a general machinist, whose duties required him, upon direction of his foreman, to make repairs to any of the shop machinery, shafts, stationary engines, turntable,, etc., belonging to the appellant and used by it in the conducting of its business as a common carrier, whether such machinery was located in Kentucky.or other points into and through which the appellee’s line of railroad ran.

On the morning of -August- 14, 1913, or just prior thereto, he was directed by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. McCall v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. McNeill v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Crocker v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Beaver Dam Coal Company v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Cole v. MayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Compton v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API