Lehman v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
After a jury trial, Quinn Lehman was convicted of two counts of child molesting1 as Class C felonies. He now appeals, raising the following issue for review: whether the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial after the State’s witness, the investigating officer, violated the motion in limine by referring to the investigation of other child molesting complaints against Lehman in his answer to a question on cross-examination.
We reverse and remand.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Lehman and Barbara Bradshaw became involved in a relationship and began living…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Herrera v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Perkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Berry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Kavanaugh v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Link v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Boney v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. LopezColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Sapen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Harris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Aspen American Insurance Company v. Interstate Warehousing IncDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.