Legal Opinion

United States v. Chujoy

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided September 14, 2016No. Criminal Action No.: 5:15-cr-00029PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Michael F. Urbanski, United States District Judge

On December 22, 2015, a jury found defendants Felix Adriano Chujoy and Carolyn J. Edlind guilty of conspiracy to engage in witness tampering under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k) (Count One), witness tampering under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(1) (Count Two), and obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 1503 (Count Three). The jury also found Edlind guilty of perjury under 18 U.S.C. § 1623 (Count Four), and a second count of obstruction (Count Five).

Before the court is defendants’ joint motion for new trial, ECF No. 127.1 Because the motion is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp. LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  5. Wilma J. Thompson v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Incorporated, Wilma J. Thompson v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Greene v. Virgin Islands Water & Power AuthoritySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API