Legal Opinion
Mastrilli v. Herz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 5, 1924PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The evidence presented by the plaintiff tended to prove these facts: The plaintiff while walking on Chapel Street, New Haven, and while in the exercise of due care, was struck and injured by an automobile owned by the defendant’s testator, Henry Herz, which was then being negligently driven by his chauffeur, one Abel. Abel had been in the employ of Herz as chauffeur for several years, and the automobile was kept in a public garage on Bradley Street. While not engaged in driving for Herz, it was the duty of Abel to remain at the garage to receive and obey any orders Herz might desire to give.
On…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Riley v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- McKiernan v. LehmaierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Carrier v. DonovanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Graham v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Shea v. HemmingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Koops v. GreggSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Fletcher v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Cronin v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Greenberg v. Lotz Asbestos Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Whiteman v. Al's Tire & Service Garage, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.