Segal v. Segal

*453OPINION

By THE COURT.

Plaintiff in error contends that she proved her right to alimony, and that it was the duty of the court under the law to make an award of alimony.

An examination of the record discloses that the defendant, Pearl Segal, on her cross-petition amply proved her charges of wrongdoing on the part of'her husband, as alleged in her cross-petition. It was shown that Segal was guilty of adultery, that he practically lived in a state of adultery for some time; that he neglected his wife,-failed to support her, and was living in a separate state.

Section 11,998 GC provides:

“Upon…