Legal Opinion

Gatton v. Gatton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERICK, PJ.

The errors complained of by the plaintiff in error may be consolidated into the one proposition that the matters adjudged, excepting the refusal of a divorce and the judgment for costs, are void for the reason that the court was without jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the things otherwise adjudged, after it had refused the plaintiff a divorce.

It will be remembered that the decree recites that the matters complained of are adjudicated “by assent of parties herein.” The plaintiff in error insists that she never agreed to the entry as made, and from the entry itself it appears…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Pennsylvania Railroad v. WempleNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Schaffer v. SchafferOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Budai v. BudaiOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Urbach v. UrbachWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lewis v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Muntzinger v. MuntzingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Gibbons v. GibbonsOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Haynie v. HaynieOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API