Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles Hartwell Parrott
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 17, 1970No. 527-69PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Parrott was charged and convicted by a jury of knowingly, wilfully and unlawfully entering or attempting to enter a federally insured bank, with intent to commit larceny therein, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). On appeal the only allegation is that the evidence was insufficient to convict.
The well settled rule of this Circuit permits us to stop short of deciding questions on sufficiency of evidence when a motion for judgment of acquittal has not been made following the conclusion of all evidence. 1 Here the motion was made and denied following the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ben Corbin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Donald R. Elbel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- James Richard Ellis v. State of Oklahoma and Warden Ray H. PageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Ray Charles Humphrey, A/K/A Ray Humphrey, United States of America v. Hiawatha MickensCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Wallace HooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Fred Louis Bell and Charles Lavern BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Millard BowieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Phillip TroutmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Bill Jack Twilligear, A/K/A Bill Jack TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.