Legal Opinion
Udo U. UDO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Henry TOMES, Commissioner for the Department of Mental Health, Defendant, Appellee
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided April 28, 1995No. 94-1931PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Dr. Udo U. Udo challenges his layoff from Taunton State Hospital (“Taunton”), which is operated by the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health (“DMH”). Udo claims that DMH laid him off because of age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 626(b), and race discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. Udo also claims that defendant-appellee Henry Tomes, the Commissioner of DMH, in his individual capacity deprived him of his civil rights in violation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Calvin Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil ToolsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Alberto Dominguez-Cruz and Nydia Negron-Ramos v. Suttle Caribe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Barbour v. Dynamics Research Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Myrtle Thomas v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Rubinovitz v. RogatoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.