Legal Opinion
D'Annolfo v. D'Annolfo Construction Co.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided August 28, 1995No. 92-P-1455PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
The plaintiff sued the maker and guarantor of a fourteen year old promissory note that, by its tenor, had become due in one year. D’Annolfo Construction, the maker, could still be sued under the twenty-year statute of limitations applicable to “[a]ctions upon promissory notes signed [as this note was] in the presence of an attesting witness, if brought by the original payee. . . .” G. L. c. 260, § 1. A jury, by special verdict on the only question put to it, *190found that the plaintiff did not at any time forgive the note. The questions at issue in this appeal are (1) whether the action against…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Merrimack Valley National Bank v. BairdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Welch v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Etelson v. Suburban Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Charlestown Five Cents Savings Bank v. WolfMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Shapiro v. BailenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cadle Co. v. WebbMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- FHS Properties v. BC AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. City of Boston (In re SW Boston Hotel Venture, LLC)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2012
- 201 Forest Street LLC v. LBM Financial LLC (In Re 201 Forest Street LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Hurley v. MerowitzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.