Legal Opinion
Bell v. Caught My Eye Photography
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 2, 2020No. 2:18-cv-00961Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION KEITH BELL, Case No. 2:18-cv-961 Plaintiff, JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson v. WORTHINGTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER The matters before the Court are Plaintiff Keith Bell’s (“Plaintiff” or “Dr. Bell”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 49, 50)1 and Defendant Worthington City School District’s (“Defendant” or “Worthington”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 47). The parties have responded and replied (ECF Nos. 51, 52, 55, 56). The motions are ripe for review.…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.