Legal Opinion
Lamb v. Holder
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 10, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2013-1976PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TANYA S. CHUTEAN, District Judge
When the FBI terminated Plaintiff Timothy Alan Lamb (“Lamb”), it determined he had engaged in gross misconduct, rendering Lamb ineligible to elect to continue health insurance coverage. This lawsuit arises from that determination. Lamb’s first cause of action seeks judicial review of the FBI’s “gross misconduct” determination. His second cause of action asserts that he was deprived of the right to continued health insurance coverage without due process in violation of the Constitution. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Esparraguera v. ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- American Federation of Government Employees v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- American Foreign Service Association v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Blaney v. GonzalezDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Glines v. Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.