Legal Opinion · Dissent

C.D. Peters Construction Co. v. Tri-City Regional Port District

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 30, 1996No. 5-95-0582Published

1DissentJustice Chapman

I disagree with the majority that the plaintiff was absolved from serving the parties with notice. Granting injunctive relief without notice is an extraordinary remedy and is appropriate only under the most extreme and urgent circumstances. Board of Education of Community Unit School District No. 101 v. Parlor, 85 Ill. 2d 397, 401, 424 N.E.2d 1152, 1153 (1981). To grant such relief without notice to the adverse party, it must clearly appear from specific facts shown by affidavit or by verified complaint that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the applicant before…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Education of Community Unit School District No. 101 v. ParlorIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Board of Education v. ParlorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. G&J Parking Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API