Arnold v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WILLIS, J.
On appeal from her conviction of credit card theft, Ruth Arnold contends that the trial court erred (1) in permitting the Commonwealth to circumvent Code § 19.2-243 by entering a nolle prosequi without notice to her and then reindicting her on an identical charge, and (2) in denying her constitutional right to a speedy trial. We find no error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Code § 19.2-243 provides, in pertinent part:
Where a general district court has found that there is probable cause to believe that the accused has committed a felony, the accused, if he is held…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brooks v. PeytonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1969
- Fowlkes v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
- Miller v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Burfoot v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
- Harris v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
- Wright v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
- Riddick v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
- Arnold v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.