Redler and Redler
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
The issue in this case is whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming a judgment of the trial court that increased the child support obligation of petitioner (father). Redler and Redler, 153 Or App 135, 956 P2d 232 (1998). We limit our review to questions of law, ORS 19.415(4), and affirm the Court of Appeals.
Father and mother’s 19-year marriage was dissolved in October 1990. At the time, the parties had five minor children, all of whom resided with mother. The trial court found that father’s gross monthly income was $6,416, and it ordered him to pay child support in the amount of $1,576…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Matter of Marriage of MasseeOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Eck v. Market BasketOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- In re Marriage of RedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Garcia-Ascencio v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Klemp v. AndrachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- Klemp v. AndrachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- Klemp v. AndrachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024