Legal Opinion
In Re Reed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 9, 2011No. 14-35976PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELIZABETH PERRIS, Bankruptcy Judge.
In this chapter 13 1 case, debtors, whose family income exceeds the applicable median income for their family size, seek to confirm a plan that pays nothing to unsecured creditors and lasts only 43 months. The chapter 13 trustee objects to confirmation on two bases: that the plan is required to, but does not, last five years and that the plan does not, according to the trustee, commit all of debtors’ projected disposable income to payments under the plan. The issues are how to calculate projected disposable income, and whether recent…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Patricia Hart v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Hamilton v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Maney v. KagenveamaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Danielson v. Flores (In Re Flores)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In re GarrepyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- In re BallewUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013
- Danielson v. Flores (In Re Flores)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012