Legal Opinion

Hills v. Goodyear

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1880Published

EROM SHELBY. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Shelby County. C. W. Heiskell, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCoopeR, J.

In December, 1871, Hills bought the interest of Goodyear in their partnership business, agreeing to assume and pay the partnership debts, and giving Goodyear a bond, with sureties, to indemnify him .against them.

- This suit was brought by Goodyear on the bond against Hills and his sureties, to recover the amount of a note, alleged to be a partnership note, which he had been compelled to pay. Issues were joined on the pleas of covenants performed, set-off by account for money had and received, and that the note was not covered, nor intended to be covered by the bond of indemnity.

The plaintiff…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bush v. . ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Bradish v. BlissSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
  3. Bissell v. WertIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Rothschild v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. Woodbeck v. KellerNew York Supreme Court · 1826

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API