Legal Opinion

Combs v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 22, 1996No. CA A83270Published

1Per curiam

Following argument on this case, the Board moved to dismiss the petition on the ground of mootness. We deny the motion without discussion.

On the merits, petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision that requires him to serve 36 months of supervised parole pursuant to ORS 144.085(c). He argues that the application of ORS 144.085 to him violates constitutional prohibitions against ex post facto laws. We agree.

Petitioner committed the crime of murder, ORS 163.115, on October 12, 1982. The rules in effect at the time petitioner committed his crime, former…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Byrnes v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Thierman v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API