Legal Opinion

Will Higlin v. State of Oregon, Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission; Craig Prins, an individual; and John Does 1-10, individuals

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 19, 2026No. 6:25-cv-00590Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION WILL HIGLIN, No. 6:25-cv-00590-AA Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. STATE OF OREGON, OREGON LIQUOR AND CANNABIS COMMISSION; CRAIG PRINS, an individual; and JOHN DOES 1-10, individuals, Defendants. _____________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge Plaintiff brings a claim for breach of contract and a claim under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

for a Fourteenth Amendment Due Process (Stigma-Plus) violation against Defendants State of Oregon; Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission (“OLCC”); Craig Prins, an individual,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. John Doe v. United States of America, in Re John Doe, Debtor. John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. John R. Ulrich, Jr., M.D. v. City and County of San Francisco Laguna Honda Hospital Maria v. Rivero, M.D. Theresa Berta, M.D. Melissa Welch, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API