Bruhn v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion
UPON A REHEARING EN BANC
ANNUNZIATA, Judge.
On April 24, 2001, a unanimous panel of this Court reversed the conviction of appellant, Christopher Bruhn, for grand larceny. The panel found the evidence insufficient to demonstrate that Bruhn committed larceny in violation of Code § 18.2-95, the only crime charged in the indictment, because it failed to prove the victim ever possessed the alleged stolen property. Furthermore, the panel rejected the Commonwealth’s argument that proof of embezzlement is sufficient to sustain a conviction under an indictment for grand larceny. We stayed the mandate of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Satcher v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
- Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
- Commonwealth v. DaltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Maye v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BruhnSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
- Bruhn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
- Marsico v. New Hanover Cnty. Bd. of Educ.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015