Legal Opinion

Maye v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 12, 1972No. Record 7892PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

Julian E. Maye (Maye or defendant) waived a trial by jury and was convicted by the trial court of grand larceny after bailment of an automobile in violation of Code § 18.1-163. Maye was sentenced to serve a term of three years in the state penitentiary.

Maye’s appeal is grounded on the proposition that the statute is unconstitutional. He says that it violates the due process provisions of the Fifth and Fourteenth amendments of the Constitution of the United States and § 8 of Article I of the Constitution of Virginia (1971).

Code § 18.1-163 provides:

“§ 18.1-163. Failure to Return Such Animal,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. Thomas F. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. Paul A. CloskeyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Sheriff, Washoe County v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mayhew v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
  3. Perkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  4. Flanagan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
  5. Esteban v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API