Legal Opinion
Lower Southampton Township v. Dixon
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 17, 2000PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Judge.
Margaret and Joseph Dixon (together, the Dixons) appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County (trial court) fining them $10 a day for violating the zoning ordinance of Lower Southampton Township (Township). We affirm.
The Dixons own and reside in a house in the Township. (Trial court op. at 1.) Joseph Dixon also owns eight classic Ford automobiles (years 1954-1976), which he stores on his property. (N.T. at 40; R.R. at 138a.) As a result, on September 16, 1996, the Township issued a notice (Zoning Violation Notice) charging the Dixons with violating chapter…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lewis E. Johnson v. Dale Atkins, Clerk of Court, Orleans Parish Civil District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Chrissy F., by Her Next Friend and Guardian Ad Litem Donna Medley v. Mississippi Department of Public WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Sea & Sage Audubon Society, Inc. v. Planning CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Baker v. Chartiers Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Johnston v. Upper MacUngie TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lower Mount Bethel Township v. North River Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- City of Phila. v. A. Epstein; Appeal of: A. EpsteinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
- City of Philadelphia v. Broad and Olney Alliance, LPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- City of Philadelphia v. J.F. JoyceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- City of Philadelphia v. JETLC Holdings LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.