Legal Opinion

United States of America, in Intervention-Appellee v. Crest Finance Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 3, 1962No. 13226PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an interpleader action presenting questions as to lien priority. This-Court held (7 Cir., 291 F.2d 1) that the Supreme Court decision in United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Company, 355 U.S. 587, 78 S.Ct. 442, 2 L.Ed.2d 510, was controlling and that the Crest lien was not superior or prior to the lien of' the United States. We held “Crest’s lien, was not choate and perfected as those terms have been defined by the Supreme^ Court.”

Crest filed a petition for certiorari. In its memorandum in response to that petition, the United States stated it had concluded the Ball case was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Crest Finance Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States of America, in Intervention-Appellee v. Crest Finance Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  4. Crump v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  5. Hoffman v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. T. C. Trigg, and Cross-Appellants, First State Bank, Crosset, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  2. George W. Ultch Lumber Co. v. Hall Plastering, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
  3. United States v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1966
  4. Valley Bank of Nevada v. City of HendersonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1981
  5. United States v. Menier Hardware No. 1, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API