Legal Opinion

State v. Randy Tim Pittman

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided April 22, 1992No. 03-90-00017-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ABOUSSIE, Justice.

The State seeks to appeal the trial judge’s order dismissing a criminal complaint charging the appellee, Randy Tim Pittman, with driving while intoxicated. Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 44.01(a)(1) (Supp.1992). Without deciding the merits of the State’s complaints, we will dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

On June 10, 1989, in Comal County, Texas, Pittman was arrested and charged with driving while intoxicated. The arresting officer drove him to the Comal County Sheriff’s office where a videotape was made of the officer’s interview with Pittman. The videotape was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MullerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. State v. DemaretCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Blankenship, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  2. State v. Blankenship, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  3. State v. Preston Charles Townsend, A/K/A Charles Preston Townsend, A/K/A Charles Townsend Preston, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  4. State v. Robert Blankenship, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  5. State v. Robert Blankenship, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API