Legal Opinion

Halprin v. Meehan

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 5, 1945No. Docket 148/415PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for specific performance brought by the vendor. The vendee answers that the title is not marketable because the beneficiaries of a certain trust were not parties to a foreclosure suit, through which comes the title of complainant.

In 1928, Ralph Haarlander, being the owner of the premises in question, made a conveyance of all his property to Llyle B. Reeb and two others, trustees appointed by a committee of his creditors. The deed ran to the grantees in trust to take possession, sell, convert into money, and with the proceeds to pay all debts and liabilities then due or to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kerrison v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Bank of Montclair v. MallasNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  3. Bank of Montclair v. MallasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  4. First Nat. Bk. of Union City v. LeslieNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heward v. HydeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API